Weitz Law Firm - 520 Kirkland Way, Ste 103 - Kirkland, WA - (425) 889-9300

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Foreclosure relief effort 'in big trouble'



Kudos to the Seattle Times for running a nice, well informed article:

AP- The Obama administration's flagship mortgage-relief effort is failing to ease the foreclosure crisis as more than half of those who have enrolled have fallen out of the program.

As of August, approximately 680,000 homeowners who applied to get their mortgage payments lowered, or about 51 percent, have been disqualified, the Treasury Department said Wednesday. That's up from about 48 percent in July.

Weitz- so more than half of those who apply don’t get any aide. I would argue even those who do get modifications are not helped out long term because the banks do not make the modifications permanent.

The report gives ammunition to critics who say the program has failed to slow the tide of foreclosures. They say it's better to let troubled homeowners lose their homes and home prices fall.

Weitz - I wonder how many tax dollars it took for the Treasury Department to create a report that outlined the obvious. Let the market place determine the market...what a novel concept.

"The problem is just so huge in magnitude that there's no viable solution that can come out of the government to solve it," said Anthony Sanders, a finance professor at George Mason University.

About 2.5 million homes have been lost to foreclosure since the recession started in December 2007, according to RealtyTrac, a foreclosure listing service. An additional 3.3 million homes could be lost to foreclosure or distressed sale over the next four years, according to Moody's Analytics.

Weitz – Note that Moody’s, who is notoriously optimistic, suggests that we are not half way to the total number of foreclosures.

Foreclosures and distressed sales are major reasons the economy has struggled to regain its footing after the recession ended in June 2009. They have forced down
home values and battered housing markets in many parts of the country.

Weitz – Anyone who thinks the recession has ended defines it differently than I do. Its almost comical that an economist would suggest the recession ended last year! Look at the Bankruptcy and Foreclosure stats…they are both way higher than 2009!! (see links for Western Washington)

Homebuilders have struggled to compete with the deeply discounted prices. Potential sellers of existing homes have also been too discouraged to list their homes for sale.

The Obama administration had grand hopes for its relief effort in February 2009. At the time, officials said the government could help as many as 4 million homeowners lower their mortgage payments to help avoid foreclosure.

Yet as of last month, only about 449,000 borrowers have received permanent loan modifications and are making their payments on time. That's only 34 percent of the 1.3 million who enrolled.

The administration's effort has been plagued by problems.
Banks weren't prepared for the volume of calls from borrowers and were slow to process requests for help.

And the Treasury Department initially allowed banks to sign up borrowers without collecting proof of their income. In the end, many homeowners were unable to provide that information or simply gave up when the process became too bureaucratic.

Borrowers are now required to provide proof of their incomes at the start of the process. As a result, the number of people enrolling has dropped dramatically. Fewer than 18,000 new borrowers signed up last month. That's a far cry from last year, when more than 100,000 were enrolling each month.

Many homeowners have concluded that walking away from their mortgages made more sense than waiting for help.

Obama officials say most borrowers who exit the program are not headed for foreclosure because many ultimately get help from their lenders. Still, they say they are not ruling out expanding or reworking the government's housing efforts.
"We're certainly not going to stop fighting to turn things around," said Raphael Bostic of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

But some housing experts doubt there's much more the government can do. The Obama administration may tweak its existing programs but is unlikely to make dramatic changes, said Howard Glaser, a Washington-based mortgage-industry consultant and official during the Clinton administration.

"There really is no federal policy approach that is going to have a significant impact," Glaser said.

Weitz- The government can only prolong the problem. They simply cannot fix it. In the end, the market forces will determine when the crisis is over.

Others say the economy is too fragile to give up. In recent weeks, Wall Street economists and academics have suggested the government could back the refinancing of all homes with mortgages backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other government entities. Christopher Mayer, a real-estate professor at Columbia Business School, said that could benefit about 37 million homeowners.
"Why not help a much broader group of consumers, not just people who are in trouble," Mayer said.

And others say the Treasury Department could do a lot more to enforce the rules of its existing program.

Alan White, a law professor at Valparaiso University, said the Treasury should be more aggressive about punishing mortgage companies that are doing a bad job of modifying loans. One way to do so, he said, would be to transfer many loans to companies that are performing better.

For more information on your rights in Foreclosure or Short sale, consider talking to a Seattle Foreclosure Attorney.

Our Firm:

Weitz Law Firm, PLLC
5400 Carillon Point, Bldg 5000
Kirkland, WA 98033
(425) 889-9300 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (425) 889-9300 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

weitzlawfirm.com

1 comment:

  1. THE SOLUTION TO THE FORECLOSURE CRISIS
    A Workforce Housing Program which has been around for more than 30 years and actively utilized in the ski resorts and many major cities could simply be applied to resolve the foreclosure crisis.

    The plan would be to offer an opportunity to all homeowners to participate in launching a National Workforce Housing Program by placing a “Deed Restriction” on their home (must live in the home, own no other home and work for a living) with a 3% yearly cap rate for sale purposes. The home would be reappraised at the new value (30% to 50% less than a similar free-market home). The mortgage would be rewritten and payments adjusted to the new appraised value.

    It would not be a “give-away” or a “bail-out” since the participants would buy-in to the program by forfeiting the “free-market” appreciation value of their home and by also participating in launching a National Workforce Housing Program, which is much needed, plus there would be no negative stigma on participants since they paid to participate.

    The home would remain affordable to workforce people and families forever due to the restricted appreciation and sale price (3% compounded yearly).

    It would not encourage homeowners who own a home they can afford to jump in on a “give-away” or “bail-out” they don’t need, but would reward them by solving the foreclosure problem in their neighborhoods and cities and allowing their home to start appreciating again and allow the economy to repair it self.

    The Plan could also be offered to bank owned and developer owned homes, which would also help the housing industry by doing away with the over-supply of homes for sale in our country which is a major problem.

    It would also create and opportunity for renters and 1st time homebuyers to purchase a home at an affordable price which is also much needed and deserved.

    This is a once in a life-time opportunity to create a national workforce housing program at a fraction of the cost of a piece-meal price while solving the foreclosure crisis and the homes would be scattered throughout communities instead of concentrated in projects.

    It is a solution to the foreclosure crisis and one that we already understand, and know how to run and implement not one we made up for the crisis.

    Families would be able to keep their homes and homes would once again become a home like in the not so long ago times of our grandparents who burned the mortgage as soon as they could and never borrowed against their home again.

    ReplyDelete