My Career and My passion: Economic, Financial & Legal insights. These are my opinions only and not meant to be relied upon. Respectful disagreement encouraged.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Uncle Sam as a Landlord?
AP- The Obama administration is examining ways to pull foreclosed properties off the market and rent them to help stabilize the housing market, according to people familiar with the matter.
Weitz- Interesting- tell me more. Initial thoughts: I think it would help falling prices and would inevitably lower rents. Here is the scary part - I envision a country full of government owned rental properties - thus I'm feeling an overwhelming itch of communism in this plan. Further, lowering rents may encourage more people to walk away from their homes and take shelter in a low cost government rental, thus encouraging the very behavior they would lead to the very thing this plan seeks to prevent.
While the plans may not advance beyond the concept phase, they are under serious consideration by senior administration officials because rents are rising even as home prices in many hard-hit markets continue to fall due to high foreclosure levels.
Trimming the glut of unsold foreclosed homes on the market is "worth looking at," said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in testimony to Congress last week.
Nationally, home prices in May were 7.4% lower than a year earlier, but after excluding distressed sales, prices fell just 0.4%, according to CoreLogic Inc.
Weitz - I love this stat: "excluding distressed sales, prices fell just .4%" - this is the equivalent of saying 'excluding the summer, Phoenix is a very comfortable year round climate'.
Foreclosures and other distressed sales now account for about 30% of homes sold each
month and sales from government-related entities make up about one third of that number.
"Adding more stock simply increases that overhang. If that can be avoided, it should be," says Jared Bernstein, an economist who left the White House in April and is now a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank in Washington. Because rents are firming up, "this idea could have some legs," he said.
Renting out homes could cover the costs of holding the properties until they can be resold once markets stabilize, potentially turning a profit for mortgage titans Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which handles foreclosures on loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration.
But scattered-site rental programs could require the government to become a national landlord, an area where the mortgage firms have little experience. They also pose accounting challenges that could produce big upfront losses.
One proposal winning support among some federal officials would sell thousands of foreclosed federal properties to private investors who agree to rent them.
Investors would rehab homes, run the leasing process, and contract with national property management firms to handle day-to-day tenant demands.
The government could keep a stake in the venture, modeled on loss-share transactions by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Officials have received interest from around a half-dozen private investors, according to people familiar with the matter.
HUD owned about 69,000 homes at the end of April and sold 11,000 homes in that month. Fannie and Freddie held another 218,000 at the end of March.
Weitz - This is an important paragraph- note the 'modeled on a loss-share transaction by the FDIC' statement. This essentially means that investors will buy the home, and if they lose money, the government will pay them back. Great deal....for investors...not so great for the taxpayer when we write checks to investors who didn't have to take any risk. Its a classic 'heads, I win; tails you lose situation' that the government has mastered (for the benefit of banks) during this crisis (see TALF, TARP, PPIP, and FDIC small bank closings).
Analysts at Credit Suisse estimate that reducing Fannie and Freddie's foreclosed-property sales to around 30,000 each month, from the current rate of 50,000, would cut total distressed sales by one third and avoid a further 3% to 5% decline in home prices.
By flushing foreclosed properties onto markets with few traditional buyers, Fannie and Freddie are "undermining their own recovery," says John Burns, the head of a homebuilding consulting firm in Irvine, Calif., who backs the public-private rental approach.
Bank-owned properties are "concentrated in certain places where lower prices are not going to get more demand," says Kenneth Rosen, chairman of the Fisher Center for Real Estate Research at the University of California at Berkeley. Simply liquidating homes at "auction prices" will drop values for all homes by another 10% to 20%, he says, pushing more homeowners underwater. Fannie and Freddie, which were taken over by the U.S. three years ago, currently rent a few thousand homes to former owners and tenants.
But the Obama administration can't enlist Fannie and Freddie's participation in a wider rental program without the approval of the firms' regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency. An FHFA spokeswoman says the agency is "open to considering initiatives that are consistent with the goals of the conservatorship."
Two years ago, investors began scooping up cheap properties at auctions in the hopes of reselling them for a profit. But with home values declining, "flipping is tough to do," says Eric Peterson, a former homebuilder and co-founder of Praxis Capital of Santa Rosa, Calif., which has launched a $10 million fund focused on renting out foreclosures.
Meanwhile, as more Americans go through foreclosure, the number of households opting for single-family rentals over the past five years has grown at about five times the pace of that for overall shelter , according to research firm Zelman & Associates.
"Do you really think a 38-year-old with two kids and two cars who was foreclosed on is really going back to an apartment? It's not going to happen," says Ivy Zelman, the firm's chief executive.
Weitz - This is an interesting theory: if it happens, the consequences, whether good or bad, will likely be different from the the initial plans.
For more information on your rights in Foreclosure, Short sale or other Real Estate issues, consider seeing a Seattle Foreclosure Attorney.
Our Firm:
Weitz Law Firm, PLLC
520 Kirkland Way, Ste 103
Kirkland, WA 98033
(425) 889-9300
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
yeah this may be the reason that lower rents may encourage people to hire rent houses instead of owing their own home but this is not truth because since if the property rate increase then the rent rates will also increase
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Dacey, But if I would going to choose, I will choose to buy my own home rather than renting.
ReplyDeletePhilippines properties
I would prefer to buy for a house than to rent because renting is not easy it needs a lot of things to be considered, unlike your own house you can do anything and everything. Big thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeletehouse and lot for sale Philippines
I am glad to find your impressive way of writing the post. Now it becomes easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thanks for sharing the post.
ReplyDeletephoenix property management
Hi buddy, your blog’s design is simple and clean and i like it. Your blog posts are superb. Please keep them coming.
ReplyDeletePhoenix Property Management
Hi buddy, your blog’s design is simple and clean and i like it. Your blog posts are superb. Please keep them coming.Pheonix property management
ReplyDelete